How pagans see the duality of light/dark is not the same as is traditional in Western society. The Western view is based on dualism where duality is broken down into two very separate and distinct irreducible parts. These parts are independent of each other and can be either complimentary or in conflict. In the case of traditional Western thought, the symbolism of light and dark is deeply rooted in the Christian ethical dualism symbolised as the battle of good (light) versus evil (dark).
Paganism on the other hand has adopted a worldview where duality is often perceived as aspects of an encompassing whole. Dualities such as light/dark thus exist as polarities - two opposite yet complementing aspects of a whole. This polarity of light/dark in Pagan thought is not the same as the dualism of good/evil, but rather associated with complimenting principles such as creative/destructive, external/internal, attracting/repelling, clarity/mystery, active/passive, masculine/feminine, order/chaos, etc.
However, what I want to talk about is not so much duality, but about how people have taken its symbolism and mysteries out of context for purely self-serving reasons.
As humans we have a tendency to create “Divine reflections”, creating deities in our own images. We make it what we need it to be to suit our personal situation. While it is true that spirituality is a personal experience, and many times personifying Deity can be a valued way to connect, therein also lies a problem for we tend to forget that nothing is ever really that cut and dry.
There is a tendency to use Divinity (Goddess or God) as a crutch. There are those who, for example, choose to work exclusively with personal interpretations of “dark” goddesses or gods as a way of justifying their own actions - a deity they believe that will carry their banner of anger and fear.
I understand that it is easy to get lost in a theology that seems to have no hard and fast rules. In contemporary Paganism morality is a very touchy and hotly debated subject most often left to the individual. Self responsibility is the key lesson. We should also remember, and accept, that all of us are going to cause some amount of harm in our lives and that the ability to deal with the consequences and learn from our experiences is not always easy – nor should it be. And, for many, it is much easier to create a personal image of Deity that makes one feel better about choices made. But it is not, and can never be, acceptable to cause harm simply because we have manufactured an image of Goddess/God that will support our indulgences.
It is true that some moral concepts are open to debate, with various shades of grey perceptions, while others are more or less black and white. It is difficult to discuss morality without falling back into the concepts of “right” (light) and “wrong” (dark). While many of us might be trying to escape such polarities, it is almost impossible to function in modern society without identifying what is considered right and what is considered wrong. Within Paganism, however, these ideas are not determined by society, and the oneness of Divinity which is inherently balanced calls for everything in nature to be in equilibrium as well, including us.
I am not saying that we should sit around feeling bad for the harm we have caused throughout the course of our lives as it is pretty much useless to dwell on the past. Neither should we assume we are bad people as mistakes, accidents, poor choices, etc. are a part of life. Without them what would there be to learn from? The point is to accept full responsibility as opposed to using Divinity to justify ourselves.
We simply cannot bypass the qualities of the Divine that we find unpleasant or useless, be they of the light or dark variety, for the Divine is a packaged deal and stripping it of any one of its inherent qualities not only robs us of its full power but it also robs us of our own full potential.
Those who are healing from emotional wounds may choose to construe an image of Divinity who supports their feelings of being wronged. In those cases a dark Goddess/God (created as a being who detests who/what we despise) may be a comforting shoulder to lean on. But is embracing a solely vengeful image of Divinity really the road to becoming a whole person?
The reality of the “Dark Goddess/God” is that she/he is not there to fuel our anger or justify the harm we cause, but to teach us of those things that are at times unknowable and that we are not always willing to embrace.
In order to pursue an earth-based religion of any kind, we have to acknowledge that we all possess a dark side, a light side, and all the grey areas between them. Divinity beckons us to look within ourselves, see those dark, scary shadows … and love them, for these shadows are not a tool to perpetuate our own secret darkness but rather the destroyers of ego.
We must realise that there is a difference between “claiming the darkness” and “reclaiming the darkness”.
(SOURCES: The Pagan Library; circleofhekate.wordpress.com)
Most inspiring!
Fri, 05/22/2009 - 17:12 — wotanwulfFor is it not that from the darkest of night the new day is born? The midnight from within should be embraced, for it is only then that you shall see the stars within. And I believe that those stars is what makes the night worthwhile.
FF
Thought-provoking piece
Thu, 05/21/2009 - 20:08 — Charlesand entirely worthy of further study.
I can't help but wonder, though, if we should not forget about the concept of 'morality', based as it is upon what is acceptable in society (mores, etc.), and rather aspire to the attainment of the altogether more difficult but purer concept of 'ethics' and 'ethical behaviour'.
What are your thoughts on this?
A BIT OF A BALANCING ACT
Sun, 05/24/2009 - 12:44 — Erebos(PLEASE have a look at Morgause’s writings on Ethics and Morality on this site.)
- I think a lot of Pagans shy away from the idea of moral codes because many have had experiences with an Abrahamic religion, predominantly Christianity, and dislike the concept of a set in stone (literally) group of divine laws that can be vague and interpreted in a variety of ways to suit one group or another.
This places Pagans in frequent dilemmas, since the primal influence on societal ethics in the Western World is undeniably Christianity. Most Pagans/Heathens within the Western World are Pagans/Heathens by choice rather than by birth. This means that in their formative years most Pagans/Heathens have had the Christian-based ethos deeply ingrained within them.
This means that while Pagans/Heathens adopt a new (for them) spirituality inherent with its own ethos, whether it be the Wiccan Rede or Asatrus Nine Noble Virtues, when pressed, Pagans quite unwittingly, often revert to the safety and comfort of their childhood ethos, with its black- and white view of matters. The fact is that a true Pagan ethos is rarely so black and white as the traditional Christian ethos.
The first step towards a true Pagan/Heathen ethics/morales/codes of conduct/etc is for Pagans to accept that they are Pagan and to break loose from the confines of Abrahamic rules and regulations. The second, and perhaps more important, thing to realise is that breaking free does not mean that it is now "a Free-for-All”.
There are many examples of Pagan ethics. Probably the most well-known contemporary Pagan ethos is the Wiccan Rede. It is possible to argue that the Rede is often misinterpreted by both adherents and detractors of Wicca, who both focus on the "do as ye will" part and conveniently forget the responsibility of the "'an ye harm none".
Asatru has taken a more definitive approach to living, with many of adherents citing the Nine Noble Virtues as the basis for action or lack thereof. The Nine Noble Virtues is also a modern development, but it has a historical connection as it is believed to be a condensation of the behaviour principles found in the Havamal. While the Nine Noble Virtues go nowhere near having the "set in concrete" status of the 10 Commandments of Christianity, they do provide a more complete and comprehensive basis for a Pagan/Heathen ethos than the very generalised concept of the Wiccan Rede.
It is my opinion, though, that there is no need for a moral code to be given by the gods for it to be spiritual/religious in nature and beneficial to the community. I think, however, that even though a moral code as such might not be necessary, a need may arise for a set of ethics as this provides a unified set of acceptable and unacceptable behaviour within any given community.
Within many Pagan organisations there are no agreed upon ethics, no generally accepted rules of conduct. While individual freedoms are a good thing, and one which should be supported and striven for, it is also useful to have groundwork upon which we can assume that, for example, one person will not lie to or about another or that oaths will not be falsely sworn, etc. (Magick, as another example, can easily become manipulative rather than transformative, serving only the needs of this moment rather than the needs of a lifetime, or of an individual rather than a community.) These things may be generally deplored by individuals in the group, but without stated guidelines objections become irrelevant and the cause of the objection is often lost in the ensuing muck-throwing contest.
Without trust between individuals, there can be no community.
For myself, I base everything I do on Responsibility, Balance and my personal belief that: Do what you will is "NOT" the whole of the law!
Erebos :)
In support of what you say here,
Sun, 05/24/2009 - 19:46 — CharlesI'm not disagreeing with you in any way whatsoever - on the contrary, in support of what you just said, I find that the thesaurus tells us that:
"Morals, ethics refer to rules and standards of conduct and practice. Morals refers to generally accepted customs of conduct and right living in a society, and to the individual's practice in relation to these: the morals of our civilization. Ethics now implies high standards of honest and honorable dealing, and of methods used, esp. in the professions or in business: ethics of the medical profession."
It seems that modern usage of the word 'moral', taken within the context of what we see out there on the streets every day nowadays, implies that somebody could quite easily be the very epitome of the scumsucking dregs of humanity, yet still be considered 'moral' judging by what passes for standards and morals in our (modern) society.
I see in supposedly normal, well-adjusted society, on a regular basis, teenagers who abuse drugs with the tacit approval of their family (EVERYBODY is smoking dagga, so why shouldn't MY child?), teenagers who are encouraged to use/abuse alcohol (Oh, if my child gets 'used' to alcohol from a young age then they won't become an alcoholic), and so on. All of these behaviours fall within the ambit of "generally accepted customs of conduct and right living in ... (South African)... society" - but are firstly fallacious, secondly dangerous, and thirdly a blatant abandonment of the responsibilities of parenthood. However, from an ethical point of view, there is absolutely NO doubt - all of these behaviours (and more) are simply wrong.
And that is what I like about ethics as opposed to morals.
There is no grey area (Oh, everybody's doing it, so it's ok).
Then again, it must also be noted that there are VERY few real parents out there - Pagan or otherwise. As you so rightly point out, breaking free from the fear-mongering paternalistic and authoritarian bonds of Abrahamic religions is very often 'overdone' to the point where the injunction to "And it harm none, do what you will" is COMPLETELY misinterpreted by virtue of forgetting (or ignoring) that "harm none" is an instruction to harm NOBODY, INCLUDING (and often ESPECIALLY) YOURSELF!
Yet more pertinent in this case, it seems that lack of involvement and lack of rules and restraint(s) w.r.t. their children is somehow viewed by Pagan parents as a 'liberating' and 'progressive' style of parenting. But parenting isn't something that happens once in a while, when you have time for it; and if it doesn't interfere with your private time; and if it (especially nowadays this would seem to be a paramount consideration) doesn't make you seem 'fuddy duddy' to your children. Parenting is something that you basically do 24/7/365 from the moment of conception till the moment of death (and sometimes beyond). Parenting is something that a parent undertakes regardless of the consequences, for the good of the child (and the community), and it means setting boundaries and limits for the sake of the child. If those boundaries and limits make the parent unpopular, well - that's part of the job-description of being a real and proper parent.
The only 'tool' that fits the requirements of the job of parenting is Ethics.
And that example/illustration is precisely the way I see the issue of ethics versus morals in ALL facets of life nowadays. What results from ethical behaviour, ethical decisions, and ethical living is ALWAYS right. Not always easy, but ALWAYS right.
Isn't that what we really want from everybody, especially ourselves? To always behave 'right'?
morality..lets do!
Fri, 05/22/2009 - 17:26 — wotanwulfLet us do forget about it. Morality is too dependant on the society of the day. Not all that long ago Northmen were scoffed at for their "immoral and unchristjan behaviour" of taking a daily bath..Today it is common practise to clean yourself daily. Morality changes to the whims of society, and is therefore not a good measuring stick. I believe that one of the main reasons any person would "convert" to a pagan religion, is because he feels the need to improve him/herself and take responcibility for his/her own life. In order to improve yourself you have to aspire to higher ideals than the socially accepted norm of the day. I would say the concept of ethical behaviour would be a good starting point.
FF
Absolutely awesome!
Thu, 05/21/2009 - 19:50 — MorgauseBravissimo Erebos! I thank you for this sublime article! This inward journey you so powerfully elucidate is perfectly described in chapter 6 of Virgil’s Aenid. The ancients called it “Regeneration” through interior union with the Divine Essence, the embracing of the shadows for the purpose of the all-changing transmutative abandon to death. Death of ego.
BB
Morgause
SAPC Registrar