A recent posting by Erebos got me to thinking about this currently fashionable tendency to 'dialogue' with xtians, and I figured I should perhaps, in the interests of helping my fellow-Pagans avoid unpleasantnesses, share my own experiences of the matter.
What happens when you dialogue with xtians?
At best, what you get is a polite silence while they supposedly listen to your point-of-view, which in reality is a time they use to regroup their thoughts and formulate a different 'conversion strategy' to show you the 'error of your ways' and get you to accept their own 'one, true, god'.
However, let's put that into perspective. I personally count several xtian ministers (of various persuasions) amongst my acquaintances and correspondents. With these people I can enjoy a conversation, we can spar and wrestle with and around theological perspectives, point out incongruities and even help each other solve seemingly huge riddles. But then, these are the xtians who are secure in their faith, and who don't feel a burning need to convert everybody around them to xtianity, who don't need to take comfort in the old cliche of 'misery loves company'.
At the same time, I number amongst my friends and acquaintances several agnostics and atheists. Their company and conversation make for extremely interesting discussions and thought-provoking intellectual jousts.
But the common or garden variety of xtian is another animal altogether - their response to a simple, factual observation that challenges any of their fondly-held beliefs is naked and ugly aggression. If they find themselves unable to formulate a rational response or posit an alternative, they react violently and in a manner more bestial than human.
A generalisation, you might say. Generalisations are odious, you may continue. Generalisations are not politically-correct, you maintain.
Well, as Rhett Butler famously retorted to the lovely but selfish Scarlett O'Hara - "Frankly, my dear - I don't GIVE a damn!"
And the reason I don't give a damn?
I have, in my OWN home, been the recipient of a vicious physical attack that sent me to seek out medical help.
I have, in my OWN home, seen precious possessions of mine destroyed in a fit of anger.
I have, in my OWN home, had my clothes ripped viciously off my body.
I have, in my OWN home, sustained injuries (including bite-wounds) that necessitated an anti-tetanus injection.
I have, in my OWN home, been threatened (why is it called 'threatened' when the attempted stabbing is successfully deflected?) with a knife purloined from my own cutlery drawer.
All in the presence of my then 5-year-old son, whose only thought was to try and help his daddy. And whom I was forced to protect by locking him away in my domestic 'safe zone'.
All of the above for what and by whom?
For the "sin" of being a Pagan, of putting my own immediate family (wife and children) before all else, for standing up for my beliefs, for refusing to allow others to criticise and denigrate my immediate family, and for asking this person to leave my house.
And the question on your lips right now is "Who? What depraved creature attacked you?"
Well, it's a little embarrassing to admit this, but it was a 68-year-old woman, apparently a devout Catholic, and somebody who supposedly (and vociferously) espouses the so-called xtian virtues of love, reconciliation, and self-sacrifice - especially her own sacrifices. Not to mention the rest of their precious ten commandments. All in the name of "teaching you a lesson, you f*ing Satanist bastard". And sombody who, when they needed their house cleansed of an evil presence came to us (my wife and I) for help - and who supposedly understood the fact that satanism is something only xtians can practice - for only xtians believe in the christ as well as satan...
See, the thing is, the xtian virtues are only practised towards OTHER xtians, as and when it is convenient to do so. But when they deal with us, whom they consider a threat because we don't blindly accept the utterings of prosperity-cultist leaders intent on feathering their own nests and fostering ever-increasingly blind devotion to the 'cause', anything goes. I have friends who have been attacked and vilified in public shopping centres by xtians. Who have had their cars vandalised by xtians. And who have ALSO been assaulted by xtians. Merely for being openly Pagan.
And there are those who would have us 'dialogue' with these xtians?
Perhaps there is also a fire somewhere that you will stick your hand into upon the behest of the 'pro-dialogue' people.
But me, I've had more than enough of discussing (or rather, TRYING to discuss) things with your common or garden xtians. Beware these creatures - they never listen except to that which they want to hear, they never understand except those things which it suits them to understand, and they never, ever admit that other religions are JUST as valid, if not even more so, as their own.
But most importantly of all, beware of these common or garden xtians. They bite.
just my opinion
Tue, 05/26/2009 - 07:37 — frater asSorry to point out the obvious, but if you are going to insist on putting your fingers in the Church doors during a storm dont be surprised when the wind picks up and your fingers get caught. People get heated when religion is discussed its been the cause for many wars over the years, expect retaliation and resistance.
You start you topic off with the word xtian which to me is rather derogatory word, the correct spelling is Christian and it is capitalized very similar the the way you have used the word Pagan and Satanist, you may not agree with their beliefs, but there is no need to be derogatory especially if you are looking for them to start accepting you.
Weather or not Christians see you as a threat or not, is a matter of opinion, i think it is more that there is a miss understanding and no amount, of ranting on about how Pagans are not Satanist, or explaining Pagan beliefs is going to change minds.
Something i learnt many years ago, each one of us has a path to walk and its only a path that is right for us, if the majority of the population want to follow a Christian path, it helps them in their life, and helps them achieve their life's goals, that is great.
Through out the word there is religious discrimination, there always has been there always has been there always will be, and there are always religions on the losing end.
Christianity was at one point in history, one of the losing religions and many a follower ended up being the main course of a "Pagan (and i use that term loosely) Roman" lion in the Circus Maximus (sp). The sandal is now on the other foot, mainly due to the growth of Christianity and the strengthening of city bylaws which now forbid the housing of lions in residential areas, which is probably good thing.
I very rarely discuss religion let alone magick with anyone, normally i will walk away from a discussion on magick, and i must say, i have discussed magick with Pagans some of with are open minded and some of them them are down right rude and very closed minded, very similar to Christians. So it works both ways.
!?*@
Thu, 05/28/2009 - 20:44 — Anubis!?*@
Ag shame...
Tue, 05/26/2009 - 08:32 — CharlesSadly, you've missed the entire point by focussing on what YOU have decided is derogatory - how many xtians are QUITE happy with 'xmas', 'xmastime', and 'Father xmas'? But YOU take umbrage at MY use of the phrase 'xtian'...
Tell you what - the day that xtians STOP referring to Pagans as Satanists - and acknowledge that Satan is a xtian God - THAT is the day I'll try to accord them more respect than they accord themselves. Ok?
The point never was about me starting a dialogue with xtians - it was in response to an earlier posting regarding such a dialogue (right up at the top of my posting, in case you missed it). Quite frankly, if I never have to deal with xtians again (especially the born-again variety) it'll be too soon - but the realities of modern society make that impossible. Therefore, as they say in English, 'when needs must, the devil drives'. We make allowances and live as best we can in the situation in which we find ourselves.
The WHOLE point is that I (and most other Pagans I know) are not 'evangelists', and we don't try to be - we don't try to convert xtians to the 'one, true path' - mostly because we recognise that there is more than just one path, and we RESPECT the path(s) that others have chosen.
But that simple courtesy is never reciprocated, and the point of my posting was that, even when we have been approached for help and the help has been given, even when we have exercised restraint and politeness, even when we have refrained from pointing out the obvious (such as the derivation of the xtian myths from pre-existing Pagan myths), and even when ALL possible measures have been taken and courtesies extended to PREVENT such unpleasant outbursts as I have described, even THEN do xtians denigrate, ignore, marginalise, insult, and attack (verbally, socially, and physically) in COMPLETE contradiction to their supposedly peaceful and loving religion.
Other than that, all you have done is state the obvious - as I pointed out above - and castigate me for what? Putting my fingers into a church door? Referring to xtians in the same vein as they regard themselves? Perhaps you would benefit from re-reading my posting after clearing your mind of all preconceived notions - and please refrain from presuming that YOUR concept of good taste and politeness should be universally accepted or practised.
One final point - if you would like to criticise my spelling and/or punctuation, please use a thesaurus to compare the words 'weather' and 'whether', and then look up 'misunderstanding' versus 'miss understanding', ok? Oh, and there is such a thing as an 'apostrophe' - it makes a HUGE difference when you talk about its or it's...
I'm starting to (re-)remember why I'm solitary.
respect begets respect
Sat, 06/13/2009 - 09:41 — ZephyrI have had dealings with all sorts of Christians, the open-minded-enough-to-listen-but-still-try-to-convince-you-of-the-error-of-your-ways type, the Let-each-to-their-own type and the you-are-EVIL-and-that-is-that type.
I have been exorcised, been banned from public places, had the police at my door after celebrating Mabon in my back garden and been harassed by my neighbour, continually calling the SPCA, screaming obscenities over the wall at me etc etc etc.
But not all are bad...
Recently I was manning the medical tent at the Hari Krishna Festival of Chariots, here in Durban, and was visited by a Catholic Priest who is working on open dialogue between different religions and who is very happy to initiate dialogue between them - it was a very interesting conversation as he knew next to nothing about Paganism. Strangely enough, I have met a LOT more of this kind recently and this man said something very interesting, he pointed out that dialogue, openness and tolerance between religion is becoming more common in the big picture. He also pointed out that, in his and many others minds, everyone ends up in the same place eventually. Be it heaven, hell, summerlands, valhalla... whatever. This approach is one I have seen and heard a lot lately - (but I wonder if we DO all end up in the same place, or the place we believe we will end up in - but that is another subject for debate).
As for Xtian and Xmas - my grandmother would most likely also attack anyone for saying that - she said it was effectively 'crossing out Christ from Christmas' - a common belief. If WE want respect from them, surely we should afford them the same wanted respect? "Respect begets Respect" after all.
It's really a 'chicken and the egg' situation, Zephyr -
Sat, 06/13/2009 - 10:13 — Charlesand until they learn to capitalise "Pagan" and "Witch", understand the difference between Paganism and xtianity (Satan IS a xtian God, after all - not Pagan - so Satanism is a sect, as it were, of xtianity), and themselves stop 'crossing out Christ from Christmas' (really a silly excuse for a fight fabricated out of ignorance - see links below), I'm going to give them more than what they deserve - which isn't necessarily what they THINK they deserve...
Links:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=xtian
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081212081203AA63lRs
http://www.answers.com/topic/xmas
Especially the last one should illustrate amply how silly it is to get worked up over something that even the xtians themselves can't agree on and mostly don't even fully understand.Pay special attention to the 'labarum'...
repsect is also earned
Sat, 06/13/2009 - 10:40 — Zephyr"I'm going to give them more than what they deserve - which isn't necessarily what they THINK they deserve..."
Which is where we differ - I believe we will never earn respect, trust, tolerance or understanding with that attitude. If we behave in an exemplary manner we will gain a greater positive reaction. (actions speak louder than words). Yes, fight the good fight, but with respect and decorum. I have won over more people, (not only concerning religion, but in general - you know, those bullies, aggressive louts, the *cough*female dog*cough and other such people that sidle into my life), with gentle words, wicked humour or common sense. Rarely have I had to resort to rudeness, anger or disrespect.
The man that tried an exorcism on me is now a friend of mine, even though I laughed, (literally), at his attempts and then asked him if Jesus was deaf!!! (I mean, do they HAVE to scream, "In JEEEEEEEESUSSSSS name)?
But the wheel doth turn and one day Christianity will no longer be THE religion anymore - history has a habit of repeating itself - although, sadly, it looks like Islam may take over. (Has anyone seen the movie on Muslim Demographics)? Maybe we will one day become a spiritual world, rather than a religious one - who knows.
Meanwhile, I will do all I can to help people understand me and my religion in a respectful manner of dialogue... Even those 'brick-wall' types :)
Just please clarify...
Sun, 06/14/2009 - 07:28 — Charleswhere you *know* (as opposed to *think*) that I'm being disrespectful to people who deserve respect.
Unless, of course, you didn't actually follow the links I so thoughtfully posted for you...
Or you're assuming that being assertive in the face of propaganda is being rude. Don't for ONE moment presume that the propagandists are being polite and civilised when they practice their sordid craft - it's all about brainwashing. Read Mein Kampf or the Karl Marx if you're even a little rusty on what propaganda is, and what it's used for...
As Wotanwulf has noted, and I have ALSO experienced, people automatically assume (yup, make an ass-of-u-&-me) that people like us are xtian. And why not?
The basic teachings of xtianity are basically sound - inasmuch as they prescribe forms and customs of behaviour - but the failure of xtianity is in the 'escape clauses' (no relation to Santa).
However, it's only in Paganism that we really see the fruits of this style of living. But it is this style of living, the Nine Noble Virtues of Asatru, really, that convince them that they're dealing with xtians.
It seems they didn't only steal our feastdays, our Myths, our Mythology, and our Holy days - they ALSO stole (or tried to) our philosophies - but made one fatal mistake: they created 'forgiveness and redemption on demand'. And that is the fatal flaw (spiritually) of xtianity or ANY other Abrahamic religion. Human nature being what it is, forgiveness is sought fervently the moment consequences start to manifest, and penance forgotten as soon as the 'danger' is past.
Maar nou ja - let's revisit this concept once you've read the links and perhaps done some more research of your own. Perhaps (hopefully) in another thread - this one is getting hopelessly narrow and difficult to read your way through...
Hailsa, Zephyr, well said
Sat, 06/13/2009 - 17:38 — wotanwulfI also find it very amusing when Christians come over, especially in the workplace, to tell me what a good Christian I am, and that I am like a role- model to them. It is even more amusing to see the zeal dissapear from their faces when I politely tell them "thank you for the compliment, but please, I am not a Christian"
The fact is, however, no matter how much you respect others, there is always some boneheaded amphibian trying to scate uphill. They would openly accuse you of being a satanist, or whatever else they can throw at you.(my personal favourite is "you anti-christ!" When they tend to take to the anti christ-persuasion, I cannot sit idly by and be bleeding-heart-bamby. To me that would be a betrayal to all I believe in. But I get your point.
All in all, well said. Thank you
FF
PS. I am glad your "exorcism" went so well. a Dear friend of mine( a devout AFM) got psychologically scarred because of just such a practise. That was 6 years ago, and she still gets counciling.
...no need to pity me
Tue, 05/26/2009 - 12:02 — frater as>>Sadly, you've missed the entire point by focussing on what YOU have decided is derogatory - how many xtians are QUITE happy with 'xmas', 'xmastime', and 'Father xmas'? But YOU take umbrage at MY use of the phrase 'xtian'...
You have a point, even though it is not valid, none of those are name of a religion. If you feel that any Christian looking to find out what Paganism is, stumbles on this site and is not offended by your words, demanding respect yet unable to spell the name of their religion correctly does not have their pre-justices reaffirmed then that is fine by me, its not my mindset you need to change.
>>Tell you what - the day that xtians STOP referring to Pagans as Satanists - and acknowledge that Satan is a xtian God - THAT is the day I'll try to accord them more respect than they accord themselves. Ok?
Ok, i consider my self a Christian (in some strange way) and i know you are not Satanists, maybe the day has come ;).
>>The point never was about me starting a dialogue with xtians - it was in response to an earlier posting regarding such a dialogue (right up at the top of my posting, in case you missed it). Quite frankly, if I never have to deal with xtians again (especially the born-again variety) it'll be too soon - but the realities of modern society make that impossible. Therefore, as they say in English, 'when needs must, the devil drives'. We make allowances and live as best we can in the situation in which we find ourselves.
The WHOLE point is that I (and most other Pagans I know) are not 'evangelists', and we don't try to be - we don't try to convert xtians to the 'one, true path' - mostly because we recognise that there is more than just one path, and we RESPECT the path(s) that others have chosen.
Cant argue with you on that im afraid, other than "What happens when you dialogue with xtians?" i thought the post was about a dialogue you had had, or maybe you didnt i dont know, this is all a bit confusing, cause now you are saying you didnt dialogue, but i though you did, anyhow lets leave it, im getting confused.
>>But that simple courtesy is never reciprocated, and the point of my posting was that, even when we have been approached for help and the help has been given, even when we have exercised restraint and politeness, even when we have refrained from pointing out the obvious (such as the derivation of the xtian myths from pre-existing Pagan myths), and even when ALL possible measures have been taken and courtesies extended to PREVENT such unpleasant outbursts as I have described, even THEN do xtians denigrate, ignore, marginalise, insult, and attack (verbally, socially, and physically) in COMPLETE contradiction to their supposedly peaceful and loving religion.
That sounds like most people would react be they Christian Muslim or Pagan, and their religion is questioned. i also remember someone say there are 3 topics that you should never discuss, Religion, Politics and another mans wife, they all end up in a fight. As for Christianity or the Christian G-d being a peaceful, that is debatable.
>>Other than that, all you have done is state the obvious - as I pointed out above - and castigate me for what? Putting my fingers into a church door? Referring to xtians in the same vein as they regard themselves? Perhaps you would benefit from re-reading my posting after clearing your mind of all preconceived notions - and please refrain from presuming that YOUR concept of good taste and politeness should be universally accepted or practised.
Ok, well im a pretty obvious kind of guy, i have noted you point and have re-read your original post... nope sorry there is noting i want to change in my previous post.
>>One final point - if you would like to criticise my spelling and/or punctuation, please use a thesaurus to compare the words 'weather' and 'whether', and then look up 'misunderstanding' versus 'miss understanding', ok? Oh, and there is such a thing as an 'apostrophe' - it makes a HUGE difference when you talk about its or it's...
Bugger i knew that weather and whether was going to come back and bite me, my english is shocking, so you will have to excuse my use of the english Language, you are much better at it then me. My dig at you was about the fact you could correctly spell Pagan and Satanist, not your use of english. And if i remember correctly as a rule Pagans like to have the word Capitalized, which i respect and do, out of common decency and respect.
Could you pls point out where i criticized your punctuation i know i did you criticized spelling, unless of course Capitalization is punctuation, which it could be, like i said my english is crap.
>>I'm starting to (re-)remember why I'm solitary.
well im sorry a Garden Christian came to bite you today, i certainly dont know why a healthy debate with me would reaffirm that you need to be solitary?
Well, the point is that this IS a religious website, isn't it?
Tue, 05/26/2009 - 18:52 — CharlesSo to say "i also remember someone say there are 3 topics that you should never discuss, Religion, Politics and another mans wife, they all end up in a fight." is pretty much moot - unless you wanted to discuss religion, I would have thought it would have been safer for you to stick to News24 or the like (where I see ANY kind of religion has been painted with the brush of xtianity i.e. fear-mongering lip-service to prosperity-cultists).
I never suggested a debate - and I'm way past debating anything with xtians, unless they're willing to provide me with proof (real, non-dogmatic, non-xtian, absolute historical empirical PROOF) that their God-man myths (stolen from Pagan Myths) are NOT myths, but (as they claim) the factual history of an actual figure, a real man from a town named Nazareth (not the actual 3-family hamlet which it really was back then - it wasn't a town 2000 years ago), whose mother was a virgin (not a maiden who became a virgin quite conveniently 600-odd years after the fact when the xtians decided to assimilate some MORE Pagan DNA), and so on and so forth. Their most common bleat is that "OUR God was one REAL man who actually walked upon the earth, a REAL flesh & blood man - unlike the Pagan Gods..." - but there were at least SIX people who claimed to be Jesus Christ, one of whom actually happened to be a Roman Legionary. Which one, if any, or perhaps all of them was the Christ you refer to?
Here's another hint: Just have a look at the Egyptian myths (where EXACTLY were the Israelites slaves for HOW many years?) and then tell me that xtianity isn't a 'Borg' version of Paganism.
Sadly, there aren't any xtians willing or able to take up that challenge - and while I reiterate that I count amongst my friends several xtians (one of whom called me tonight from the border to ask me - yup, ME! - to pray for him on his route into Botswana to perform an outreach to the people there), these are people who can understand the differences between dogma, facts, and faith. And with whom issues of faith are discussed, not debated. In short, intelligent people with a great depth of knowledge about their religion and its origins - not just what the minister told them in Sunday School - and with respect for ALL other religions (Chapter 2 of the S.A. Constitution refers to freedom of religion - and that means ANY religion, not just xtianity).
While we're at it, and you want to try and paint my scribblings as disrespectful, why don't YOU tell your fellow xtians on their xtian websites that it's uncomplimentary and offensive to talk about Pagans and Witches being put to death in the name of your god? That, I'm afraid, is a common biblical quotation hauled out by xtian prosperity-cult evangelists in order to scare people into accepting THEIR little make-believe god, the god of fear, the god of (conditional) forgiveness, the god whose OTHER side (the meaning of "Satan" is derived from "Shai'tan" which means "the antagonist") is the most famous and feared of ALL xtian gods, one Satan. Duality indeed - and then they blame it all on the Pagans...
To refresh your memory, have a look here:
Exodus 22:18 says, "Suffer not a witch to live." Deuteronomy 18:10 says, "There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch."
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/sermons/witches.html
I kid you not - it's real, it's now, it's hate-speech, and it's defended in the name of xtianity. This is only ONE of dozens, if not hundreds, of similar hate-spewing xtian sites out there on the web RIGHT NOW!
While we're at it, go and look up 'Lucifer' and ask yourself why Satan (the Prince of light) has his name usurped by Jesus in Revelations 22... However, if you would like the answer, look no further than the word "Duality" - the Yin & the Yang of xtianity, as it were. The light and the dark? Two sides of the same coin?
To refute your claims of innocence wronged, did you perhaps miss this paragraph (especially the last 20 or so words)?:
"A recent posting by Erebos got me to thinking about this currently fashionable tendency to 'dialogue' with xtians, and I figured I should perhaps, in the interests of helping my fellow-Pagans avoid unpleasantnesses, share my own experiences of the matter."
Let's end this discourse by saying the same thing that teenage girls' parents should be telling their daughters - "unless you respect yourself, don't expect anybody else to respect you." Hence the 'xtian'.
Other than that, hopefully you at least learned something here today. Other than the obvious fact that some (gatvol) Pagans can spell and construct grammatically correct and properly punctuated sentences, that is...
Tyr's Blessings upon you!
enough
Wed, 05/27/2009 - 06:40 — frater asOk this has gone far enough, and is starting to get very silly and out of hand i am willing to take the blame, i pointed out what i didnt think was very nice use of a word on a "religious tolerance website", and i should have kept my mouth shut, it actually had nothing to do with me, for that i apologise to every one here.
Personally and i dont have the time nor energy to defend Christianity, my concept of Christianity is very different to main stream Christianity, and generally i care very little for it. Im sorry to point this out to you but you clearly do not know who i am or who i represent in South Africa, if you think i am some garden Christian who wondered off the street here you are very mistaken.
There are just 2 points i would like to make about your last post, Christ was not his name is name was Jesus but what he obtained was "Christhood", this is a stage of enlightenment same as "Buddha" same as Crowleys "Knowledge and Conversation of the HGA", hence the name Jesus Christ it means the anointed or enlightened one, there are many people who have obtained "Christhood" or "enlightenment" Jesus if he existed was but only one of many. Im also not entirely convinced Jesus ever existed, i think the story of Jesus and his works where a lot of simple stories written by educated people to educated the people of the time, and teach them some morals. Some of the more interesting books that should have made it into the bible give a far more gnostic flavor to the life an stories about Jesus, but these were left out of the bible as we know it, cause the church want to control and remove free thought, especially gnostic thoughts.
As for the suffer a witch thing i have been though this so many times, i shall do it one more time, the originally hebrew version of the bible of the verse goes along the lines of "thou shall not suffer a Sorcerer to live" now in the times it was written in the it mean a healer that was not trained, the Christian Church changed this in the middle ages to the line everyone loves to quote, to justify what they were doing.
Are you are speaking on behalf of the SAPC when you say you want me to leave this site and stick to news 24, think and choose your words very carefully, in 20 years of being part of the Occult community in this country i have never been asked to leave a Pagan group?
poisoner, not sorcerer
Mon, 06/08/2009 - 09:31 — Damon Leff"the originally hebrew version of the bible of the verse goes along the lines of "thou shall not suffer a Sorcerer to live" " - Frater AS
Hi Frater :-)
The correct translation was 'thou shall not suffer a poisoner to live'.
The word 'sorcerer' is a French equivalent to the English 'witch'.
But certainly, I understand your point.
Heya Damon long time no see
Fri, 06/12/2009 - 16:24 — frater asHeya Damon its been a while...i seem to have managed to kept my views out of the general South African Pagan Community for a while now, i just got bored the other day and decided to make a nuisance of myself *bad Frater, bad*.
Yes you are correct about the above translation, i must admit i wrote most of the above, and below posts in a very bad and hasty frame of mind...that seems to be a bit of a bad trait of mine.
anyhow on a completely different note, i see you are going to the Pagan Conference, my wife is attending, unless of course the sky falls on her head, or she falls out of the sky off her broom, i will get her to come over send my regards. I would attend (strangely enough i was invited) but i think the last thing you want there is a bunch of us Christian, Golden Dawn types getting ourselves all upset about the use of the word Xtian hee hee.
Actually, the real reason i cant attend is im doing child minding duties while my wife attends the conference, it kind of makes more sense for her to be there as she is a Pagan.
hello
Mon, 06/15/2009 - 14:25 — Damon LeffI look forward to meeting your wife - do hope to meet you one day in person Frater.
I personally have no objection to "Golden Dawn types". :-) I am sure we have more in common that one would think.
Everybody is Invited!
Sat, 06/13/2009 - 09:57 — MorgauseEverybody is invited and everybody is welcome at the SAPC Conference, Frater.
You folk could share the child-minding duties and give one another turns to attend the conference. :)
BB
Morgause
SAPC Registrar
Are you nuts?
Wed, 05/27/2009 - 07:27 — CharlesWhere were you asked to leave this site?
Perhaps you should visit me for some remedial reading classes - my EXACT words were:
"unless you wanted to discuss religion, I would have thought it would have been safer for you to stick to News24 or the like"
This deliberate misinterpretation on your part (which seems to be a habit with you) appears to be a ploy to provoke me (amongst others). Which isn't working, incidentally.
But you seem EXTREMELY confused - in your second posting on this topic you called yourself a 'garden christian':
"well im sorry a Garden Christian came to bite you today"
but now you say you aren't:
"if you think i am some garden Christian who wondered off the street here you are very mistaken."
(What were you 'wondering' about when you 'wandered' off the street?)
Quite honestly, you appear to just be looking for a fight - so I'll treat you with the contempt you so obviously deserve.
nope bit of prat sometimes not nuts though
Wed, 05/27/2009 - 07:45 — frater asI though i had apologized right at the beginning for wasting time, like i said i had had enough im not wasting time defending something i dont beleive in.
i clearly mis-read your post from what i understood you were telling me to stick to news 24, i was wrong, the last 4 lines of my post were badly worded, but i said them so i will now have to stick to them
No harm intended, so
Wed, 05/27/2009 - 07:53 — CharlesNo harm intended, so therefore no offence taken - let's bury the hatchet (not in each other's skull, though), and move forward...
Tell us about yourself - your approach seems interesting.
>>Tell us about yourself -
Wed, 05/27/2009 - 08:26 — frater as>>Tell us about yourself - your approach seems interesting.
What approach? hanging round Pagan sites and pissing off all the good Pagan folk with my attitude...only kidding
i fit into the general term of a Ceremonial Magician (we tend to be a bunch of self-centered prats most of the time), i have been involved with the occult for about 20 years. My main interest and the system i work is known as The Golden Dawn system, and it covers subjects such as Kabbala to the Tarot to Ritual Magick to Astral Projection, to Enochian Magick.
It would be really nice...
Wed, 05/27/2009 - 11:19 — Charlesif you could be persuaded to do a quick primer on the Golden Dawn system from your own viewpoint and post it here as a separate topic (hint-hint)...
I know Erebos touched upon this a little while ago, but it would be nice to see some more in-depth information.
Pursuit of knowledge is the one commonality I've noted amongst all Pagans - the other is their reluctance to agree with each other (cat-herding is easier to accomplish, they tell me).
So howsabout it?
C.
I'll second that request...
Wed, 05/27/2009 - 11:23 — wotanwulfWould be nice to hear more...especially from your viewpoint on the Golden Dawn.(and maybe we can look at Enochian as well?)
FF
Very Excited!
Wed, 05/27/2009 - 17:07 — MorgauseYes, gentlemen, I am very excited about the prospect of seeing an in-depth piece on the Order of the Golden Dawn posted on the SAPC website. Is next week too soon? **smile**
BB
Morgause
SAPC Registrar
ok
Thu, 05/28/2009 - 07:57 — frater asI will see what i can whip up
Yea i can do that
Wed, 05/27/2009 - 11:55 — frater as@ Charles yes i will happily do that.
@ wotanwulf Enochian is a bit of a strange thing, what is it that you want to know? I can give you a basic run down of the system, and how it works, but its a very misunderstood system, there is a fair amount of Enochian language used in Golden Dawn ritual, and its powerful to say the least.
But as for Dees system im of the opinion that the original Golden Dawn members didnt understand the system, they created, using the notes of Dee, recently people like Donald Tyson have refined the system, and made it far more accessible. I havent read any of his books on Enochian but i believe he has cracked the system.
Technically,
Wed, 05/27/2009 - 16:34 — wotanwulfAs I understand, Enochian is an Angelic language, and the basic theory behind the practise is that there is power within the spoken word, as in "in the beginning was the Word"
I recently re-read Modern Magick by Donald M Kraig, and noticed again his reference to Enochian, right next to a dire warning that Enochian is not to be trifled with. Many people I have heard from are of opinion that it is because of Crowley's misunderstanding of Enochian that led to the deterioration of his health.(I guess it could have been the drugs, who knows). However, I have also read some of Crowley's stuff,( though I find it infinately creepy, some of it! ) and I am none the wiser here. Anyway, what I am saying is I am out of my depth here, and could use some direction.
FF
a basic outline
Thu, 05/28/2009 - 06:48 — frater asIn the middle ages there was a man called John Dee and he was a member of the royal court, between him and his scryer a man called Kelly they discovered a system called Enochian magick.
The system its self is pretty complex you need 2 people, one person to scry into the astral and one to open the Aethyrs. The general format is to open the Watchtowers with an opening watchtower ritual, then to start with the Enochian calls, i think there is 32 of them, anyhow once you have opened the Watchtowers and used one of calls one of the Enochian beings will being to communicate with the scryer. Dees original system was to use one of the watchtower Tablets to communicate with the entity.
As for the use of Enochian language, it appears in some of the Golden Dawn rituals and initiation rituals. Its really powerful and purely through the use of it, a presence can be felt in the room. Its a bit like the Barbourus (sp) names of invocation used in Goetic magick.
I do agree with Kraig Enochian is dangerous, i think far more than Goetic magick, there was a man called Paul Foster Case who was a member of the Golden Dawn, he left the and one of his reason was he disliked the use of Enochian in the rituals, he felt it was evil, he went on to form an order called B.O.T.A..
Enochian is only taught to a person in the inner order of the Golden Dawn, which means you would have had a minimum of 4 but more likely 8 years of intense study into the occult, before you were introduced to Enochian Magick, and even then its only done under guidance by a teacher.
They say Crowleys deterioration came from one experience when using Enochian in the desert with his side kick Neuburg (sp), he decided to open the Aethyr and call Chronzon except he was going to sit in the triangle and let Chronzon possess him. Im not so sure Crowley was all the great even before that incident, i have never been a great fan of his, a lot of his early stuff he took credit for was stuff he stole from the Golden Dawn changed and added his own wording to.
There are far better and easier ways to contact other entities, and less dangerous than using Enochian, with out the proper training you are going to burn you fingers.
second thoughts
Thu, 05/28/2009 - 06:53 — frater asim starting to have second thoughts about discussing Enochian magick here im not so sure we should be discussing in a forum such as this one, i think this supposed to be the public face of Paganism here in SA.
oh and my column is getting smaller and smaller.
Thank you,
Fri, 05/29/2009 - 05:11 — wotanwulfI must say, I find this very interesting...but I wouldn't mess with it, though. Sorry to respond so late, I exeeded my internet budget a bit
FF
Can't help a quiet chuckle...
Thu, 05/28/2009 - 10:20 — Charleswhen reading your last sentence - it gets really weird when the columns get this narrow, and quite 'otherwise' to read! Please rest assured that we are not trying to 'throttle' you or your opinions! hehehehe
On a serious note, drop Morgause a line - I don't think there should be too much of a problem posting on Enochian if it's in a section where you must be signed-in to access it. Other than that, I believe it can only do a lot more good than harm - at least you're giving the facts, as opposed to the misconceptions people will read on the general 'net and consider to be factual... Amazing what people will believe if they just see it on the internet.
Thank You
Thu, 05/21/2009 - 15:47 — MorgauseI enjoyed your posting Charles!
Must say, I have met some apparently really "tolerant" Christians ... but most religious debates with them end up showing that they are quite the contrary ... after all they believe in "the way, the truth and the light" ( it think it was) ...
But don't you agree that somebody [perhaps not by someone in your own immediate family]has got to be bitten? And shouldn't we as Pagans just be a far more active/militant in making our rights respected?
*U.S. Pagan Bill of Rights*
(author unknown to us)
1. Pagans shall have the same freedom to worship that is granted to
followers of other religions.
2. Pagans shall have the same respect of all elected officials who
represent them that is afforded to followers of other religions.
3. A Pagan parent's religion shall not be used as evidence for the
purpose of deciding child custody issues.
4. Pagans shall be free to work without regard their religion, and
should be free from proselytizing and harassment at the workplace.
5. Pagans shall have the same freedom to conduct their lives that is
given to followers of other religions, within the boundaries of the law,
without interference by, or discrimination from representatives of their
local, state, or federal government.
6. School district personnel and classroom visitors shall not
proselytize or harass Pagan children while on public school property or
at public school functions.
7. Pagans shall have the same freedom to exercise all of their rights as
do all other American citizens.
8. Pagans are entitled to the free exercise of their beliefs and rituals
and must be protected from the interference of others during the
practice thereof.
9. Pagans shall have the right to redress when their religious rights
are abused.
10. Pagans shall be able to wear sacred symbols of their faith in
environments where followers of other faiths are free to express
themselves similarly.
http://paganinstitute.org/PIR/Interfaith.shtml#A%20Pagan%20Bill%20of%20R...
Is our Bill of Rights not more than sufficient? Damon said on SAPRA " I would personally prefer Pagans to embrace Chapter 2 of our Constitution. :-)" and I agree completely.
Your take on it?
Registrar
Oh, YES!
Fri, 05/22/2009 - 06:56 — CharlesI agree wholeheartedly and unreservedly - but what I always find to be the biggest stumbling-block in the pursuit of our rights and recognition is something which I first heard Mynie say "getting Pagans to agree on something or to work together is like herding cats"...
Me, I'm long past the point of being a quiet and polite Pagan in 'mixed company' - I'm loud and proud about it - but I'm quite lonely in that respect.
It doesn't worry me too much - I've always identified myself as a warrior in the Asatruan tradition: not overly concerned with the formalities and iron-clad traditions of my beliefs (my RC background and experience kind of soured that kind of formal religion for me), but absolutely resolute and unshakeable on the supreme priority of what I call my 'concentric circles' - myself and my Gods, then my IMMEDIATE family (SWAMBO, and children), then parents and siblings, and so on - right at the very outermost limits are what I would call 'society'.
But what frustrates me beyond belief is the inability of people to adopt and live by a code of ethics. Even morality seems beyond most people - and sadly, this doesn't seem confined to non-Pagans. My experience has been that not all Pagans are ethical, moral, or even halfway honest - which only proves that they are basically representative of society in general. But those that I find to BE ethical, moral, and upstandingly honest - those people make me proud to be Pagan and relieve a lot of the sadness and frustration occasioned by those 'other' Pagans.
I'll never stop fighting - in whatever context appropriate to the situation - for Pagan rights and recognition. But, by all that is Holy and Precious, if only there were more like me, more people committed to their belief system and prepared to stand up for it, more people prepared to take up weapons and fight - perhaps then I wouldn't feel so alone.
But it seems that there is something in the nature of the 'fluffy-bunny brand' of Paganism that lends itself to martyrdom, that actually seeks out and embraces, as some sort of unholy penance, the denigration and decrying of the Pagan way of life by those who call themselves xtians.
Strangely, I find resonance with very few Pagans outside of Asatru, or as I have decided to re-identify myself, the Nordic Path. Yes, there are the exceptions (and you know who you are!), but by and large I detect more than just a little reluctance amongst most Pagans to stand up for their religion and to be counted.
Say what you like about the xtians, about their general wilful ignorance and obfuscation regarding their claims about their religion, and their shameful treatment of Pagans ever since they gained the upper-hand in society, their real strength nowadays lies in their willingness to be identified and counted as xtians. And until the Pagan community as a whole displays that same willingness to be recognised and counted as representatives of their Pagan beliefs, we will not again be worthy of the rich heritage of our Pagan forefathers (and mothers!) who were not only prepared to be seen as Pagan, but also to die for their beliefs. That's a far cry from the timid little wannabees who only appear fleetingly at public rituals when they can so so without raising the suspicions of 'ordinary folk', and who stand idly by when Pagans are wrongly (but persistently and wilfully) characterised as satanists or the like. Even worse, of course, are those who call themselves Pagans and Witches - but who do so only for the attention it brings, and who are conspicuous by their absence when work needs to be done.
THAT, most importantly of all, is non-negotiably the most vital and crucial battle we as a Pagan community must not only fight, but win convincingly and publicly. If we fail in that, we will NEVER succeed in establishing and enjoying our rights as Pagans.
I couldn't say it better!
Fri, 05/22/2009 - 16:54 — wotanwulfMan, I agree with you completely in this respect. I am glad to see that the old Gods still have some warriors out there, not only people who expect the gods to fight their battles for them...I was starting to feel quite lonely these last couple of years, because though I am no great Traditionalist when it comes to Asatru rituals, I try hard to uphold the NNV, wich means that displaying courage is quite high on my priority list. And to be perfectly honest, displaying courage can become quite discouraging after a while when you feel that you are the only duck on a turkey farm...I started to believe that im the only one in this country who still pray to the Old Gods. It is good to see I am not alone.
FF
Hear Hear!
Fri, 05/22/2009 - 14:48 — MorgauseCan't agree more, Charles! Let's be the change we wish to experience in the world (my apologies to Ghandiji for misquoting him)! Avanti!
Morgause
SAPC Registrar
To Wotanwulf and Morgause:
Fri, 05/22/2009 - 18:18 — CharlesAh, it feels like coming home...
To find myself once more amongst kindred spirits.
This last stretch of time has weighed heavily upon my spirit - like Wotanwulf, I too was beginning to despair, to question the reasons for my commitment to the Pagan Community and to resent the toll it has levied upon myself.
The losses of the last year have taken their toll on our own little spiritual community: one of our number, after fighting and beating off the dreaded spectre of cancer, was killed in a MVA; a partnership of senior members within our coven was destroyed by the cancer of addiction on the part of one, leaving us bereft and grieving, angry at this untimely sundering of what had been a beautiful relationship; and the loneliness of the warrior, always on guard, never deeply sleeping, has exacted a terrible price - to feel isolated and alone, committed to the Gods and the Pagan way of life, but watching as others pay only lip-service, and to live with that deep dark anger and resentment at those who trivialise and marginalise the honesty and purity of the Pagan way of life - that has imposed a toll greater than I ever suspected.
Thank you both.
Hailsa, and ditto.
Tue, 05/19/2009 - 18:44 — wotanwulfI guess we all have our bad experiences.
What can I say...been there, done that and lost the T-shirt
frith ond frofre...
Salutations!
Thu, 05/21/2009 - 20:01 — CharlesMethinks I was wearing that (lost) t-shirt of yours that sad day...
I'm glad to see I'm not alone - although being 'beaten-up' by a little old lady is a humbling experience!
:-)
AND BEWARE!!
Fri, 05/22/2009 - 17:39 — wotanwulfWare the little old ladies of this world...once bitten,twice shy...no?? :):)
FF
Strength and Honour!
Sat, 06/13/2009 - 16:05 — Luke MartinI am pleased to see the warriors of the Old Gods and to feel the passion of our ancestors.
We can Heal with Cold Steel, we can cleave minds with ancient wisdom, we do not live by faith...
Ours is the path of of the warrior - both spiritual and physical. Solemn, strong, logical and wise.
As the blood of our warrior fathers courses through us in this age of watery escapism, let us not forget that we are few. This site is for Pagans (as defined by SAPC), it is a public forum.
Let us always speak with this in mind, protecting at all times the dignity of a warrior class.
Mynie once said to me that a soldier knows when to retreat. I replied that a warrior is not a soldier who follows orders. A warrior never retreats, he fights to the death in the name of what he believes to be right, moral and upright.
Let us at all times strive to be real warriors - chivalrous, gallant, honourable - and never bring our "Paganness" into disrepute.
BB
Luke